On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This error seems to be an issue with depedencies. Are you using an
> TinkerPop <dependency/>s in your project. I believe Neo4j 1.5.M01 is
> depending on Blueprints 0.9 which does have the getInEdges(String...) method
> (similarly for getOutEdges(). Perhaps you are depending on Blueprints 0.8
> somewhere in your project and the class loader is getting confused?
>
Don't really understand this suggestion. I downloaded neo4j from
http://dist.neo4j.org/neo4j-community-1.5-SNAPSHOT-unix.tar.gz, unpacked it,
then started up a server using `bin/neo4j server`. After loading in a node
via the rest interface, I ran the above command. I don't have a project that
could be relevant.


>
> Also, you don't need an identity pipe. You can do:
>        g.v(1).both
>
ah nice. (This still causes the same exception though.)

Cheers,
Xavier


> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Xavier Shay wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I have just upgraded to neo4j 1.5 (brew install neo4j --HEAD) and am
> getting
> > the following exception whenever I try to use a pipe:
> >
> >> curl -H Accept:application/json -X POST -d
> '{"script":"g.v(1)._().both;"}'
> > -H Content-Type:application/json "
> > http://localhost:7474/db/data/ext/GremlinPlugin/graphdb/execute_script";
> > {
> >  "message" :
> >
> "com.tinkerpop.blueprints.pgm.impls.neo4j.Neo4jVertex.getInEdges([Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Iterable;",
> >  "exception" : "java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
> >
> com.tinkerpop.blueprints.pgm.impls.neo4j.Neo4jVertex.getInEdges([Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Iterable;",
> >  "stacktrace" : [... trim, see
> > https://gist.github.com/1d6df2b03fa4d402ade3... ]
> > }
> >
> > The same command without ".both" works as expected. Other pipe methods
> such
> > as "outE" all cause the same exception. This was working with 1.4, and I
> > couldn't find any mention of backwards incompatibility in the Gremlin
> > changelog.
> >
> > I'm not sure how to debug this further. Any suggestions?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Xavier
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to