Thanks Peter for your answer. While my thinking were different from dynamo
too and i'm still searching where part of my explanation are too incomplete
or fails, good news about orientation taken in release 2.x, it will be very
interesting to know how it works.

Yes, your answer helps :)
Regards
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Peter Neubauer <
peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote:

> Kynao,
> Neo4j HA is right now a multiple slaves - single write master
> architecture that will have a write guarantee on 2 nodes if you write
> to a slave - the slave itself and the master.
>
> While this is good and stable for failover and read-heavy production
> scenarios, in the next version of Neo4j (2.x) we are looking at
> actually sharding the graph more dynamically than a Dynamo ring,
> especially runtime, on different machines, so we kind of hop over the
> stage of having configurable guarantees in a dynamo replication
> cluster in order to reach the dynamic graph sharding stage faster.
>
> HTH?
>
> Cheers,
>
> /peter neubauer
>
> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
> Skype       peter.neubauer
> Phone       +46 704 106975
> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>
> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Kynao <cloudbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm interested by the "Multi-master" feature like explained here
> >
> http://www.assembla.com/spaces/orientdb/wiki/Multi-master_server_architecture
> .
> > i'm also interested to discuss this proposition...
> >
> > What do you think ?
> > What re you remarks ?
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Multi-master-server-architecture-tp3335268p3335268.html
> > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to