Very good, thanks a lot. On 10/11/11 1:21 AM, chris.gioran [via Neo4j Community Discussions] wrote: > Hi Thibaut, > > we currently have a working solution that changes the commitCows() > call from a during commit call to an afterCompletion synchronization. > It seems to work fine and your test case passes. Essentially it roots > out the implicit assumption in that part of the kernel that he > transaction should be available during the commit. > There is a code freeze in place however in preparation for the > upcoming milestone release, so you could either wait for the release > after that or clone the source shortly after, probably late this week. > > hope that helps, > CG > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:01 AM, tcolar <[hidden email] > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3411962&i=0>> wrote: > > > Hi Chris. > > I don't mean to pressure, I write OSS myself and I know time is > > available whenever it is, so i just have some quick questions about > this > > issue. > > > > Basically I just need to decided whether to shelf this feature of our > > project for now or if i can get any idea on how much work / how long it > > would take to get it working. > > > > 1) Do you think it's an issue with atomikos itself and I should I bring > > the issue to them ? > > 2) Is that something that would be fixed in neo4j itself, if so do you > > have any rough estimates ? > > 3) Is there some sort of workaround you could think of that I could > > implement ? > > > > Any other suggestions or ammount of work/time needed would be > appreciated. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Trying-to-use-Neo4J-with-Atomikos-transaction-manager-issues-with-Lucene-index-tp3400319p3411656.html > > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3411962&i=1> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3411962&i=2> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Trying-to-use-Neo4J-with-Atomikos-transaction-manager-issues-with-Lucene-index-tp3400319p3411962.html > > > To unsubscribe from Trying to use Neo4J with Atomikos transaction > manager, issues with Lucene index, click here > <http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3400319&code=dGNvbGFyQGNvbGFyLm5ldHwzNDAwMzE5fDEwMTQ4MDI1NQ==>. > >
-- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Trying-to-use-Neo4J-with-Atomikos-transaction-manager-issues-with-Lucene-index-tp3400319p3412696.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
