Mmh, I would actually do it the other way round - have a number of replicated Neo4j instances (possibly via Neo4j HA, see http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/ha-setup-tutorial.html) and then push traversals via GoldenOrb onto these instances and merge the results.
WDYT? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:40 AM, amitp <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey thanks, > > I've just read goldenOrb wiki, it's seem related BUT if I understand > correctly it's helps just with the distribution. I'm looking for a more > complete graph package that can be easily distributed (I don't want to > implement my own query engine). > > So I think I'll need to get into the depths of neo4j and see if I can change > the implentation to work on GoldenOrb Nodes... > > Does this make sense? any points before I get lost in the code? > > Thanks again, > Amit > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Transparent-Distributed-Queries-tp3414168p3414876.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
