Yeah, you're right this wouldn't be a good idea for big graphs, and probably
having different behaviors implemented depending
on the size of the graph neither.

What about showing nodes that fulfill a set of rules based on their
properties, i.e. something
like which is already implemented for the visualization profiles?

In my case that would be sufficient cause I always add a property NODE_TYPE
for all nodes, that way I could
just create a couple of filters like 'where property node_type = X ' and
then retrieve only the nodes of the type I'm interested in
(regardless where they are situated in the graph).


On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Peter Neubauer <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Pablo,
> I think this is mostly an issue of bandwidth and performance in
> processing the whole graph on the client side, alternatively
> generating some aggregated view on the server side but be less
> responsive on the client side.
>
> How do you imagine such interaction working? Got a hunch?
>
> Cheers,
>
> /peter neubauer
>
> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
> Skype       peter.neubauer
> Phone       +46 704 106975
> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>
> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Pablo Pareja <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, I'd rather like to have the option of visualizing the whole graph
> > without having to specify
> > a depth value (cypher option) or direct IDs/Index lookup(Peter's) , cause
> I
> > can think of different scenarios where
> > that wouldn't be possible in principle.
> > Would it be very difficult to implement the whole graph option?
> > There already is a method in GraphDatabaseService class where you can
> access
> > all nodes (then rels. implicitly as well)
> > in your graph; so, couldn't you use this method to somehow achieve this?
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Pablo
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Peter Neubauer <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Or,
> >> as long as you can address the nodes, e.g. via Index Lookup or direct
> >> IDs, which should return disconnected graphs, too.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> /peter neubauer
> >>
> >> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
> >> Skype       peter.neubauer
> >> Phone       +46 704 106975
> >> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> >> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
> >>
> >> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph
> database.
> >> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
> >> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Jacob Hansson
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > No, there is currently no way to do that.
> >> >
> >> > Once we add cypher support to the databrowser search bar, you would be
> >> able
> >> > to write a cypher query that returns everything at some arbitrary
> depth,
> >> > which in practice could be used to return the whole graph, as long as
> >> it's
> >> > all connected, would that be good enough?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > /jake
> >> > On 2011 10 18 10:52, "Pablo Pareja" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Can this be achieved without having to access a subset based on some
> >> >> property/id/etc... and then
> >> >> opening all incoming/outgoing relationships and so on?
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >>
> >> >> Pablo
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Pablo Pareja Tobes
> >> >>
> >> >> My site     http://about.me/pablopareja
> >> >> LinkedIn    http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes
> >> >> Twitter       http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja
> >> >>
> >> >> Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.ohnosequences.com
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Neo4j mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Neo4j mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Neo4j mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pablo Pareja Tobes
> >
> > My site     http://about.me/pablopareja
> > LinkedIn    http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes
> > Twitter       http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja
> >
> > Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com
> >
> > http://www.ohnosequences.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>



-- 
Pablo Pareja Tobes

My site     http://about.me/pablopareja
LinkedIn    http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes
Twitter       http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja

Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com

http://www.ohnosequences.com
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to