Cool. Thanks.

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Peter Neubauer <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Nuo,
> this is recreated now, but I had no time to fix it yet, just FYI.
>
> https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/69
>
> Cheers,
>
> /peter neubauer
>
> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
> Skype       peter.neubauer
> Phone       +46 704 106975
> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>
> http://www.neo4j.org              - NOSQL for the Enterprise.
> http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Peter Neubauer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks Nuo,
> >
> > submitted as a bug at https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/69
> >
> > Feel free to track it - hope to get to it next week.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > /peter neubauer
> >
> > GTalk:      neubauer.peter
> > Skype       peter.neubauer
> > Phone       +46 704 106975
> > LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> > Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
> >
> > http://www.neo4j.org              - NOSQL for the Enterprise.
> > http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Nuo Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hey Peter, using the example of my original email, this is the
> corresponding
> >> json body I post when I created the node:
> >>
> >> "{\"uid\":\"12345\",\"name\":\"\\u4f8b\\u5b50\"}"
> >>
> >> A single GET query returns the name data (as raw json) as:
> >>
> >> \"name\" : \"\xE4\xBE\x8B\xE5\xAD\x90\"\n
> >>
> >> which after JSON parse becomes the correct one:
> >>
> >> "name" => "例子"
> >>
> >> When sending the same request as a POST to /batch, the server returns
> the
> >> following raw json:
> >>
> >> \"name\" :
> >>
> \"\xEF\xBF\xA4\xEF\xBE\xBE\xEF\xBE\x8B\xEF\xBF\xA5\xEF\xBE\xAD\xEF\xBE\x90\"\n
> >>
> >>
> >> which after JSON parse becomes the busted result:
> >>
> >> "name"=>"¦ᄒヒ¥ᆳミ"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Peter Neubauer <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Guys,
> >>> Do you have a JSON string you would use to set properties on a node?
> Can
> >>> then update a test with it and check.
> >>> On Oct 21, 2011 7:27 AM, "Nuo Yan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Yea, I'm pretty sure it's not a client parse issue. The data is
> correct
> >>> in
> >>> > the database, and a single GET query returns the right data, only
> when
> >>> > doing
> >>> > the same request as a part of the bulk request, it returns busted
> data.
> >>> >
> >>> > It can be reproduced using curl and as well as rest client. I'm using
> >>> 1.4.2
> >>> > stable.
> >>> >
> >>> > Anyone from the neo4j team has any insight on this?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Rick Bullotta
> >>> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > I doubt it, since a GET works fine.  It's probably an encoding
> issue
> >>> > > somewhere in the batch processing pipeline.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> >>> [email protected]]
> >>> > > On Behalf Of Daniel Fitzpatrick
> >>> > > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 10:37 PM
> >>> > > To: Neo4j user discussions
> >>> > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] [bug?] Unicode node property not returned
> >>> correctly
> >>> > > from bulk REST index search
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Possibly an issue with the client code not understanding unicode.
>  Is
> >>> > there
> >>> > > something you could use as a baseline to rule the database out eg
> maybe
> >>> > the
> >>> > > web admin?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Oct 20, 2011 7:48 PM, "Nuo Yan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I have nodes with data properties with unicode (Chinese/Japanese)
> >>> > > characters
> >>> > > such as:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > {"uid" => "12345", "name" => "例子"}
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I index such nodes with their id, so that by doing this (where
> >>> > users_index
> >>> > > is the index, uid is the key, 12345 is the value):
> >>> > >
> >>> > > GET to /index/node/users_index/uid/12345
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I can get back the right result:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > {"indexed"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/index/node/users_node/uid/12345/6638
> ",
> >>> > > "outgoing_relationships"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/out";,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > * "data"=>{"uid"=>"12345", "name"=>"例子"}, *
> >>> > >
> >>> > > "traverse"=>"
> >>> > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/traverse/{returnType}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "all_typed_relationships"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/all/{-list|&|types}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "property"=>"
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/properties/{key}
> >>> ",
> >>> > > "self"=>"http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638";, "properties"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/properties";,
> >>> > > "outgoing_typed_relationships"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/out/{-list|&|types}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "incoming_relationships"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/in";,
> >>> > > "extensions"=>{},
> >>> > > "create_relationship"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships";,
> >>> > > "paged_traverse"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/paged/traverse/{returnType}{?pageSize,leaseTime}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "all_relationships"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/all";,
> >>> > > "incoming_typed_relationships"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/in/{-list|&|types}
> >>> > "}
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > However, if I do the same search query as a part of a bulk REST
> >>> request:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > POST to /batch:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > [{"method" => "GET",
> >>> > > "to" => "/index/node/users_index/uid/12345",
> >>> > > "body" => {},
> >>> > > "id" => 0}]
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Returns the node in the body, however, with bad characters in the
> data
> >>> > > field:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > [{"id"=>0, "body"=>[{"indexed"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/index/node/users_node/uid/12345/6638
> ",
> >>> > > "outgoing_relationships"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/out";,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > *"data"=>{"uid"=>"12345", "name"=>"¥ᄂᄃ¥ツᄏ\uFFE7モワ"}, *
> >>> > >
> >>> > > "traverse"=>"
> >>> > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/traverse/{returnType}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "all_typed_relationships"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/all/{-list|&|types}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "property"=>"
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/properties/{key}
> >>> ",
> >>> > > "self"=>"http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638";, "properties"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/properties";,
> >>> > > "outgoing_typed_relationships"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/out/{-list|&|types}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "incoming_relationships"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/in";,
> >>> > > "extensions"=>{},
> >>> > > "create_relationship"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships";,
> >>> > > "paged_traverse"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/paged/traverse/{returnType}{?pageSize,leaseTime}
> >>> > > ",
> >>> > > "all_relationships"=>"
> >>> > > http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/all";,
> >>> > > "incoming_typed_relationships"=>"
> >>> > >
> >>>
> http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/6638/relationships/in/{-list|&|types}
> >>> > > "}],
> >>> > > "from"=>"/index/node/users_node/uid/12345"}]
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Do you think if this is a bug or is there anything I can change to
> make
> >>> > the
> >>> > > bulk request return the correct Chinese/Japanese characters? I can
> >>> > > reproduce
> >>> > > this all the time.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > Nuo
> >>> > > _______________________________________________
> >>> > > Neo4j mailing list
> >>> > > [email protected]
> >>> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>> > > _______________________________________________
> >>> > > Neo4j mailing list
> >>> > > [email protected]
> >>> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>> > > _______________________________________________
> >>> > > Neo4j mailing list
> >>> > > [email protected]
> >>> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>> > >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Neo4j mailing list
> >>> > [email protected]
> >>> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Neo4j mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Neo4j mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to