What about
atDepth(0) ?
Michael
Am 03.11.2011 um 03:33 schrieb Peter Neubauer:
> Alex,
> looking at the source, the Evaluators.toDepth() does:
>
> public static Evaluator toDepth( final int depth )
> {
> return new Evaluator()
> {
> public Evaluation evaluate( Path path )
> {
> return path.length() < depth ?
> Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_CONTINUE : Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_PRUNE;
> }
> };
> }
>
> So it won't work. However, question is if it should be inclusive or
> not. WDYAT? I could change it to
>
> return path.length() <= depth ? Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_CONTINUE :
> Evaluation.INCLUDE_AND_PRUNE;
>
> Cheers,
>
> /peter neubauer
>
> GTalk: neubauer.peter
> Skype peter.neubauer
> Phone +46 704 106975
> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>
> http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise.
> http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Alex <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi everybody
>>
>> when setting fromDepth and toDepth both at zero, like in the following code
>>
>> Traversal.description.breadthFirst
>> .evaluator(Evaluators.fromDepth(0))
>> .evaluator(Evaluators.toDepth(0))
>>
>> I'm expecting to get only the start node, but I don't. Am I missing
>> anything?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Cheers
>> Alex
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/zero-fromDepth-and-toDepth-tp3474825p3474825.html
>> Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
