Hey guys, We have an issue <https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/92> on Github that's nagging me. In Cypher, you can declare a path by assigning it to an identifier, like so:
MATCH p = a-->b The issue we have is that when the relationship between a and b are optional, we might end up with a path that contains at least one null. Now, my question is: a) Should Cypher allow paths (org.neo4j.graphdb.Path) with null in them? or b) Should Cypher just not allow you to have optional relationships assigned to paths? WDYT? Personally, I'm leaning towards b. I don't see an use case that would be helped by a, and a introduces problems that I'd like to avoid. Andrés _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
