This seems to be a bug in Lucene 3.1.0 and I can confirm that it doesn't exist in 3.4.0, so I'm hoping neo4j will update the dependency soon.
2011/11/12 Mattias Persson <[email protected]> > It looks to be a bug. I ran the test case and while it's supposedly should > work it doesn't... I'll try to look at it asap. > > > 2011/11/8 ptashcka <[email protected]> > >> well, as I mentioned, node may still be found by text key/value pair, but >> not >> numeric >> also - the remove is not the problem, same issue if we just add same node >> with another key/value to the index >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Numeric-index-update-tp3490124p3490221.html >> Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > > > > -- > Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] > Hacker, Neo Technology > www.neotechnology.com > -- Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
