Uservoice seems great. If rapportive uses it, http://feedback.rapportive.com/forums/42557-general then it is good in my book. I think we should try it if we can integrate this with GIThub issues.
Pablo, impressive feedback on http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv ! I think Mattias will be delighted that the supernode support is on top ;) Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Peter Bell <li...@pbell.com> wrote: > Uservoice might be a good fit. I used it for feature voting on as OSS project > and it worked out pretty well... > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Nigel Small <ni...@nigelsmall.name> wrote: > >> Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P >> >> On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, "Pablo Pareja" <ppar...@era7.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could >>> edit. >>> I have no idea though about how could this be done.... >>> Any ideas? >>> >>> Pablo >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small <ni...@nigelsmall.name> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> How about something like Wufoo? >>>> >>>> http://www.wufoo.com/ >>>> <http://www.wufoo.com/> >>>> >>>> *Nigel Small* >>>> Phone: +44 7814 638 246 >>>> Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ >>>> GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name >>>> MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk >>>> Skype: technige >>>> Twitter: @technige <https://twitter.com/#!/technige> >>>> LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigelsmall >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 19 November 2011 18:45, Peter Neubauer >>>> <peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you >>>> poll, >>>>> like a Google form that everyone can edit? >>>>> On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, "Pablo Pareja" <ppar...@era7.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created >>> an >>>>>> issue for those which didn't have one so far. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, >>> their >>>>> vote >>>>>> was lost, could you please vote again? >>>>>> From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should >>>> create >>>>>> its respective issue before adding it. >>>>>> At least, whenever a new option is added, the votes for the rest of >>>>> options >>>>>> are conserved, so we should be able update our votes just adding our >>>> vote >>>>>> (or not) to the new ones. >>>>>> Sorry for the inconvenience! >>>>>> >>>>>> Pablo >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pablo Pareja <ppar...@era7.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is >>>> that >>>>>>> every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get >>>>> lost >>>>>>> and you have to edit your vote again... >>>>>>> So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll >>>> only >>>>>>> once their respective issues has been risen in github. >>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pablo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Pablo Pareja <ppar...@era7.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as >>> part >>>>> of >>>>>>>> the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pablo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer < >>>>>>>> peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Guys, >>>>>>>>> This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate >>>>> missing >>>>>>>>> voting on Github with this, linking back to github for >>> discussion? >>>>>>>>> On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, "Pablo Pareja" <ppar...@era7.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) >>>>>>>>>> @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at >>> creation >>>>>>>>> time, (as >>>>>>>>>> how things are right now with relationships) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson >>>>>>>>>> <matt...@neotechnology.com>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja <ppar...@era7.com> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in >>>> order >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> know >>>>>>>>>>>> which features (that are missing right now...) are the most >>>>>>>>> important >>>>>>>>>>> ones >>>>>>>>>>>> for the community. I just did a quick google search for >>> free >>>>>> online >>>>>>>>>> poll >>>>>>>>>>>> creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know >>> a >>>>>> better >>>>>>>>>> site >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> do this?). >>>>>>>>>>>> The address for the poll is: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv >>>>>>>>>>>> So far I just added three features that came to my mind >>>> while I >>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>> creating it, so please say which features you're missing >>> and >>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>> add >>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>> so that we can all vote for them or not. >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think about all this? >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Pablo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Pablo Pareja Tobes >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My site http://about.me/pablopareja >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes >>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ohnosequences.com >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com] >>>>>>>>>>> Hacker, Neo Technology >>>>>>>>>>> www.neotechnology.com >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Pablo Pareja Tobes >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My site http://about.me/pablopareja >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes >>>>>>>>>> Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.ohnosequences.com >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>>>>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>>>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Pablo Pareja Tobes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My site http://about.me/pablopareja >>>>>>>> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes >>>>>>>> Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.ohnosequences.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Pablo Pareja Tobes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My site http://about.me/pablopareja >>>>>>> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes >>>>>>> Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.ohnosequences.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Pablo Pareja Tobes >>>>>> >>>>>> My site http://about.me/pablopareja >>>>>> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes >>>>>> Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja >>>>>> >>>>>> Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.ohnosequences.com >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Neo4j mailing list >>>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pablo Pareja Tobes >>> >>> My site http://about.me/pablopareja >>> LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/pabloparejatobes >>> Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pablopareja >>> >>> Creator of Bio4j --> http://www.bio4j.com >>> >>> http://www.ohnosequences.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Neo4j mailing list >>> User@lists.neo4j.org >>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> User@lists.neo4j.org >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
