On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Mattias Persson <matt...@neotechnology.com>wrote:
> > Correct, it finds paths on that depth only. If other paths are encountered > along the way they aren't returned. > > However, in the example I provided it misses a path that is present on the desired depth, that's what I was actually wondering about. In this example: The source of the testing program is here: https://gist.github.com/1391654 Output before adding the additional relationship: https://gist.github.com/1391668 Output after adding the additional relationship: https://gist.github.com/1391661 shortestPath misses one path (at depth 3) unless an additional relationship is present, which is unrelated to the paths between the nodes. Petar _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
