As of now Livy does not support Java 9, Livy just updated to build on Scala
2.11 and has to keep in sync with the supported Scala and Java versions
supported by Spark, which also does not yet support Java 9.

                                                                                
   
 Alex Bozarth                                                                   
   
 Software Engineer                                                              
   
 Spark Technology Center                                                        
   
                                                                                
   
                                                                                
     
                                                                                
     
                                                                                
     
 E-mail: [email protected]                                                    
     
 GitHub: github.com/ajbozarth                                                   
     
                                                                   505 Howard 
Street 
                                                             San Francisco, CA 
94105 
                                                                       United 
States 
                                                                                
     








From:   kant kodali <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   02/01/2018 01:53 PM
Subject:        is Livy compatible with Java 9?



HI All,

I had things working fine with respect to Livy in Java 8 and I wanted to
see if it works in Java 9? I get the following error just from starting the
app.

Exception in thread "main" java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
java.io.IOException: Internal Server Error:
"java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.io.IOException: RSCClient
instance stopped."
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:191)

Thanks!!

Reply via email to