Marvin Humphrey wrote on 11/13/12 6:38 PM: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Peter Karman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 11/13/12 11:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> >>> I would oppose a seek() which runs implicit searches behind the scenes >>> because it would surprise users with a hidden performance cost. >> >> I was imagining that $hits->seek() would just adjust the iterator pointer, > > Why not just use the `offset` parameter to Searcher#hits? So long as > rerunning the search is ruled out, adding seek() offers little functionality > beyond what we already get from `offset`. >
point taken. I re-read the swish-e docs just now and seek_result() does just what offset does. /me retracts -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
