I agree. If it has been tested enough that big bugs are gone (and I think it has as most of us are using it) then we should release it.
Otherwise, the masses using 0.10 are not on the same page, and are missing out. In the unlikely event that an unfound bug does come up after it is released, the time could better be spent fixing the issue instead of the endless testing of the last 1% of the code. Basically, at some point, we have to say it is *good enough* :) * ding >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/2007 9:45 a.m. >>> Hi Eugene, I have to agree with Jochen's sentiments. If the test process is unlikely to change, then just release 0.11 anyway. It's highly unlikely people are going to give you grief over it. I think I've seen more messages here related to people either using the outdated 0.10 thinking it's stable or problems playing snapshot roulette with 0.11-dev than anything particularly useful. I'm not really sure where the notion that they're not releases comes from, though. Is it just because they're not 1.0? Anyway, no really faults you or any of the other developers for having limited time resources. But, if that be the case, just cut releases anyway so that everyone can at least be on the same page when talking about features and/or bugs with each other. -- Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: Eugene Kuleshov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 4:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [m2eclipse-user] What version of Maven2 is > actually being used > > Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >> PS: BTW, I would strongly recomment to update to the > latest dev build. > > If so, why is it a dev build? > For all you care both of them aren't releases anyways. Dev > builds declare limited amount of testing and given present > resources we can't provide proper testing. > > However, in practice, dev builds confirmed to be reliable > for a daily use and currently we are not planning to fix > issues reported against releases that made before most recent > dev builds (again, not enough resources). > > regards, > Eugene > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WARNING: This email and any attachments may be confidential and/or privileged. They are intended for the addressee only and are not to be read, used, copied or disseminated by anyone receiving them in error. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and delete this message and any attachments. The views expressed in this email are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the official views of Landcare Research. SirTrack http://www.sirtrack.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
