There is a place for m2eclipse and Q4E, the plugin philosophy are different.
>From my point of view, one give maven access to eclipse, the other one change eclipse for maven. I started with m2eclipse, then tried q4e, and goes back to m2eclipse with 0.9.0. Q4E could be a major part of the Eclipse Buckminster build process, where m2eclipse will stick with pure maven (but I could be wrong). Regards >2008/3/20, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul G wrote: > > I think the feature m2eclipse really needs is the WTP integration or did I > > miss it slipping in 0.9.0? > > > > Paul, we had some basic support for WTP for quite some time now. See > project wiki page for more details. > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/M2ECLIPSE/Home > > We still have work to do to make it dead simple to use and few people > expressed interest to work on such improvements. So, anyone who would > like to participate, please don't hide in the bushes and let me know. It > would really help us to get this functionality in faster. > > > I think it would really be good for someone to produce a article comparing > > the 2 tools, I would but my 2 young children have limited my time to play > > with stuff outside work. > > > > Usually any kind of comparison is a fairly subjective. Though there is > some feature matrix comparison is being maintained at > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Eclipse+Integration > > regards, > > Eugene > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
