Hi, Thanks for testing with the new branch.
Don't take in account the error it may be : - tapestry resource loading issue - a problem in resources deployement due to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-823 In all cases, it is not relevant with this issue. I think the fact that testWarOverlay is included as a jar, and not as classes like original behaviour, can be a blocking point in some cases (classloading issue). I think the main problem we will have with Maven war overlays integration is to keep as stupid as the default behaviour : just copy files without trying to do higer level things. This is very important to keep the same behaviour than the mvn command. On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Fred Bricon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > FYI, I ran a quick test with your projects against > "http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/branches/ear-support/"; branch. It > turns out that : > - The 2 projects have the correct Web Facet (2.3) > - testTapestry has testWarOverlay in the web app libraries > - testWarOverlay dependencies don't appear in testTapestry's classpath > - when deployed in wtpwebapps : > * testTapestry is still missing WarOverLay.html > * testWarOverlay dependencies are correctly deployed in > testTapestry\WEB-INF\lib > * testWarOverlay is deployed as a jar in > testTapestry\WEB-INF\lib. When opened, you can see it's actually a war > > Once deployed on tomcat, I got the following error : Can't find bundle > for base name test, locale fr_FR. I have no experience w/ tapestry so > I can't tell if it's caused by an incorrect deployement or just a > missing properties in your test project. > > regards, > > Fred Bricon > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Bouiaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have added a test case and some explainations to >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-599. >> >> Martin, do you agree with what I wrote and the test case ? >> >> Eugene, I am not sure to understand your sentence "It doesn't need to >> work in Eclipse, as long as it can be built from the command line and >> result war could be deployed, say on Tomcat server.". >> Since Maven cmd line tool already work with WAR overlay to create WAR >> archive, it could be used to test the behaviour by manually deploy >> this war to WTP wtpwebapps directory. But since we need to have it >> working with WTP integration, I think we need to make it works in >> Eclipse. Do you agree with that ? >> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Bouiaw wrote: >>>> >>>> After reding carefully MNGECLIPSE-597, I think Martin is right, issue >>>> MNGECLIPSE-599 "Support war overlay dependencies" is not a dup of >>>> MNGECLIPSE-597, so I reopened it. >>>> >>>> Since a lot of voters thought it was war overlay support, I hope it >>>> will be possible to plan also MNGECLIPSE-599 for 0.9.7, as this is a >>>> killer feature ;-) >>>> >>> >>> Sounds good. Can you please provide a more complete test projects that >>> would demonstrate copying overlayed resources into the target war and would >>> also allow to deploy war. It doesn't need to work in Eclipse, as long as it >>> can be built from the command line and result war could be deployed, say on >>> Tomcat server. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Eugene >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> > > > > -- > GMail rox! > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
