I too have this problem on 0.9.6 but can't figure out how I'd report a good
test case for a defect.  It doesn't happen on all projects either.  I have a
particular project that it occurs on almost all the time.

I can see that the resources are copied, but then disappear at some point
during the build.

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Karl M. Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I also find myself running into this problem: my resources get processed
> during a clean but then disappear halfway through (most of the time).  I'm
> using 0.9.5, though.  Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
> ------------------------------
>
> Ok thanks for these explanations.
>
> I have already checked the builders order, and Maven is the last one.
> I will try to do more tests in order to provide you a project that
> show this issue.
>
> Regards
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Igor Fedorenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Bouiaw wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I don't really understand the default values for resource processing,
> >> especially :
> >> - why should we run process-test-resources and not process-resources
> >> after a clean ?
> >
> > m2e projects include both main and test classes/resources, so it is
> > theoretically possible that some tests require processed test resources to
> > run successfully. I agree that chances are slim, but overhead of running
> > through couple of extra empty build phases is negligible.
> >
> >> - why process-test-resources is not needed after resource changes ?
> >
> > We're trying to limit extent of possible changes done by maven during
> > incremental build. process-test-resources generates sources, resource,
> > compiles classes all of which take time to execute and potentially trigger
> > other builders.
> >
> >>
> >> I know that we can cutomize these value, but as it is default value I
> >> would like to understand how it works.
> >>
> >> I have begin to play with these values because on one of my project,
> >> when I run a clean + build in Eclipse, resource files are created in
> >> target/classes at the beggining of the build but are removed at the
> >> end ! If I replace default values for after a clean
> >> "process-test-resources" by "process-resources resources:resources",
> >> it works.
> >
> > Current implementation is sensitive to builders order. Can you please verify
> > if maven build is configured to run after java builder? This should be
> > addressed to a certain degree by MNGECLIPSE-707.
> >
> >>
> >> A related question is : does it make sense to configure the following
> >> all inclusive command for both default values : process-resources
> >> process-test-resources resources:resources resources:testResources
> >
> > As I explained above, running almost complete maven build lifecycle for
> > incremental resource changes maybe very expensive. Also,
> > process-test-resources implies the other goals for all standard maven
> > project types.
> >
> >>
> >> I have tried to reproduce it in a test case project but it works well
> >> in my simple test project ...
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for your answers.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> BTW, this one should be added in a FAQ page until resolved, it could
> >>> save users hours of headaches :)
> >>>
> >>> 2008/7/11 Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>> 2008/7/11 Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  There is a jira issue for that already. Please vote on it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  MNGECLIPSE-707: action "update project configuration" should restore
> >>>>> proper
> >>>>> order of project builders
> >>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-707
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Done !
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>>
> >>>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>
> >>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> >   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to