Hi Eugene, Yes, I'm using WTP integration, and even trying the new EJB and EAR support =D
My question was more about if there is a standardization in the name of generated-sources / generated-resources folders. Does M2Eclipse recognizes there folders as source folders by their names? My problem is that I am trying to deploy a WAR using WTP, but I have some generated-resources that have to go to the root of the war, and not to WEB-INF/classes. Can you see a solution to this case? Thanks! On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Eugene Kuleshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felipe, > > Have you looked at WTP integration? > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/M2ECLIPSE/WTP+mini+howto > > We are not planning to work on other proprietary support for war projects. > However if someone decide to work on something like that, m2eclipse project > configuration framework should allow to implement it. See > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/M2ECLIPSE/Extensible+project+configuration+framework > > regards, > Eugene > > > > Felipe Kamakura wrote: > >> Hello again! >> >> It is true that M2Eclipse recognizes target/generated-resources as a >> resource folder, if I run a Update Project Configuration, right? Is there a >> similar folder that M2Eclipse recognizes as a *webapp* folder in a WAR >> project, thus copying these resources to the root of my .war? >> >> Thanks! >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
