On 4-Mar-09, at 9:15 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
I originally hoped that some clever naming scheme would allow
resolution of Eclipse/OSGi dependencies from Maven repositories.
Unfortunately, I could not come up with such a scheme and eventually
convinced myself it was not possible (but I'd be happy to be proved
wrong here).
I still believe artifactId == bundleId convention makes sense, but
it is not enforced in Tycho.
+1
The convention of artifactId == bundleId is what I've agreed on with
Peter Kriens and I'm sure we'll just decide this is the case at the
OSGi tooling summit.
I would also use OSGi versions (i.e., major.minor.micro) and use -
SNAPSHOT in manen and .qualifier in OSGi. Again, this is not
enforced in Tycho.
Apart from than, I would just follow Maven best practices.
--
Regards,
Igor
Max Spring wrote:
Hi Igor,
would you have any pointer or insight into how to best map OSGi
bundle / Eclipse plugin names into Maven coordinates?
I find a lot of confusing discussion.
I see this posting from Jason
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200805.mbox/%3c69ecb380-90d7-4718-bd2d-a0e22a85b...@maven.org%3e
which makes a lot of sense to me, but on the other hand I see
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/org/eclipse/ following
http://www.jroller.com/carlossg/entry/eclipse_jars_now_in_maven
I need to populate my internal group repository with Eclipse
artifacts and I would like to follow the most "standard" naming as
much as possible.
Regards,
-Max
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
----------------------------------------------------------
the course of true love never did run smooth ...
-- Shakespeare
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
