It uses murmurhash, correct? If so, it should be good. If not, we should upgrade to that. (I think I remember that it does)
Apparently a big (almost accidental) win in our collections relative to trove was fewer collisions and thus better memory use and speed. This can be attributed to murmurHash, I think. (I can't remember where I saw these benchmarks) On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> wrote: > I think a general purpose one like the one in hadoop should be fine, > personally. Plus we already have it accessible on the classpath. :) >
