According to me, the first line is redundant (checking for future.isDone()).
future.get() will alone serve the purpose.  The snippet of code that I had
attached was from the latest revision of mahout.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Possible-multi-thread-issue-in-AbstractDifferenceRecommenderEvaluator-tp1571411p1571781.html
Sent from the Mahout User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to