Hi Ted, I can't give you an exact amount but more or less it could be around 10^5 non-zero elements per row.
Could you please let me know, why the lanzcos algorithm is not always returning the values in a decreasing order? Thanks. Pedro. ---------------------------------------- > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:34:19 -0800 > Subject: Re: Lanczos Algorithm > To: [email protected] > > How many non-zero elements? > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM, PEDRO MANUEL JIMENEZ RODRIGUEZ < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I was talking about 10^9 rows and 10^9 columns > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > From: [email protected] > > > Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:07:16 -0800 > > > Subject: Re: Lanczos Algorithm > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:17 AM, PEDRO MANUEL JIMENEZ RODRIGUEZ < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > In this project I would have to work with matrix of 10^9, which have a > > very > > > > sparse data. > > > > > > > > > I think you mean 10^9 rows and 10^9 columns with much fewer 10^18 > > non-zero > > > elements. > > > > > > Is that correct? > > > > > > Can you say how many non-zero elements? > > > >
