On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Darren Govoni <[email protected]> wrote: > Drew, > Thanks for the tip. It works great now!
Great, glad it's working. > PS. the sort command you suggested doesn't quite sort by LLR score > because its only a lexical sort and misses something like 70.000 should be > greater than 8.000 >> Running the results through 'sort -rm -k 6,6' will give you output >> sorted by LLR score descending. Oops, thanks for pointing that out -- that 'm' is a typo -- should be 'n', e.g: 'sort -rn 6,6'
