You're right, I forgot about that. We'd have to rename Vector.size() to
Vector.dimension() to be consistent... And maybe Matrix.size() too?
Makes the refactoring a little bit more complicated. I think we should
also keep Vector.size() and Matrix.size() as deprecated methods for a
little time so we don't break any uncommitted patches.
What do you think?
--sebastian
On 12.02.2011 03:29, Ted Dunning wrote:
It's a great idea.
Changing any accessor names is a bit of a bigger deal, but still
probably a good idea if we get consensus.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Any objections to that? I'd go for a quick refactoring without a
jira if no one objects.
