I amn't someone else, but this is my impression as well. I used both to retain a bit of generality.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Chris Schilling <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 2, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > Uh... it has been some time since I read Funk's blog entry on this nor have > I read the code you reference, but isn't it typical for such incremental > solvers to put the singular values with U or V? Suppose that we really get > matrices X and Y instead of the orthonormal matrices U and V such that > > Maybe someone else can chime in here. I was under the impression that d1 = > d2 = sqrt(s) in this incremental approach, but this is pretty new to me.
