The formula at the bottom of the page gives interesting results
compared to Pearson's and Spearman's.

http://books.google.com/books?id=GYeCVypPpaAC&lpg=PA316&pg=PA316#v=onepage&q&f=false


On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]> wrote:
> This paper compares Pearson, Spearman and Hoeffding's D measure as
> similarity measures for DNA matching. It claims Hoeffding is the best.
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19634197
>
> Chasing down Hoeffding as a similarity measure, the closest I've come
> is the Hoeffding Bound or Additive Chernoff Bound. Page 2, right-hand
> column has a description of the algorithm:
> http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/pedrod/papers/kdd00.pdf
>
> Is this the right base math? Given this formula for acceptable errors,
> what would be the algorithm for a similarity measure?
>
> Also, what does a negative correlation value mean? Should I just look
> at the absolute value?
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> [email protected]
>



-- 
Lance Norskog
[email protected]

Reply via email to