We changed lots of names as we pulled them over. We also added test cases.
The changes at this point are pretty substantial. At the lower level, we changed the way things worked and added new kinds of collections. At the math layer, we pretty massively changed things by adding the ability to create new types of vectors and matrices more efficiently and easily than with Colt and by deleting vats of code. Pretty much all that survived was the API style and some of the higher level algorithms like probability distributions. The Vector and Matrix classes are very different internally from Colt. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Marko Ciric <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. > I was just browsing the Kolt source and haven't found them. Just asking. > > > On 06/23/2011 04:21 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > >> Colt? the mahout-math and mahout-collections code are based on that. >> >> However FastMap isn't -- that's my own creation from the old collaborative >> filtering framework. >> >> But recently there has been talk about switching all of this to use >> fastutil >> (?) >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Marko Ciric<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> How similar are Mahout collections (like FastMap) with Kolt (cern.kolt)? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Ćirić >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >
