Sorry for my poor wording. Just to confirm: for CNB, smaller is better? for NB, larger is better?
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Robin Anil wrote: > Smaller is better(negative number so largest of the negative number in > absolute value), this is to say if you have the lowest affinity to the > complement class, you have highest affinity to the actual class which the > data belongs to. > Unless the new computation is spitting out positive numbers > in which case its the largest. :-) > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: > >> What's the interpretation of scores for the output from the new >> (complementary) naive bayes classifiers? Larger is better, right? >> >> Thanks, >> Grant >> >> >>
