There hasn't been much use-case for clustering up to now. Also, our clustering is dead slow which discourages use.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote: > Scale is one of Mahout's primary benefits. And at scale you require > evaluators or you ignore quality. I don't know of another choice--hence my > original question. I can only assume that people who cluster at large scale > are currently not concerned with quality? Or could it be that people are > not clustering large data sets because they have no way to judge quality? > Seems like this issue has a self-fulfilling nature. >
