I am unaware of such comparisons. I also don't know of any practical implementations for doing really huge decompositions in parallel.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, mohsen jadidi <[email protected]>wrote: > Thank you for your replies. What I am interested to know is that if I want > to compute the SVD for huge matrix , how much faster my computation get by > using Mahout. > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > IMO it doesn't make much sense to compare non-parallel and a parallel > > algorithm (assuming they are running approximately same flops-sized > > computation). Which is probably why there's not so many (i don't know > > any). > > > > However, there are studies comparing parallel approaches (e.g. certain > > mahout vs. giraph methods) given same amount of flops capacity in a > > cluster, but i think you need to be more specific because there are > > too many areas of interest you are talking about. > > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:57 AM, mohsen jadidi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I am looking for some case studies which has evaluated some of Mahout > > > algorithm implementation like different decomposition or different > > > classifier. I just want to know how much faster is the Mahout in > compare > > of > > > regular non. paralleled algorithms.I couldnt find anything useful. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > -- > > > Mohsen Jadidi > > > > > > -- > Mohsen Jadidi >
