This could be entirely correct -- it depends on your data. None of these values are wrong or surprising per se.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Thomas, Sebastien <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your reply! But all the others give me pretty similar results. > > Pearson: -0.14<similariry<0.12 > Uncentered_cosine: 0.79<similarity<0.85 > Tanimoto: 0.001<similarity<0.2 > Loglikelyhood: 0.8<similarity<0.99 > > Thanks >
