The output will be in a report file under core/target, I think. Look for a file with OnlineLogisticRegressionTest in the name. Saving to a separate file is a fine approach as well.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Rajesh Nikam <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Ted for providing testcase that helped me to look into details of > the problem that I am facing. > > Got how to run test case using maven: > > mvn test > -Dtest="org.apache.mahout.classifier.sgd.OnlineLogisticRegressionTest" > > However I could not see printf output spitted on console, so I have saved > output to file. > > Now I will look at the results and update in case of any issue. > > Thanks > Rajesh > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Rajesh Nikam <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Mat, > > > > Thanks for pointing out link for JIRA for this particular case. > > > > Could you extend one more help: > > > > I have not used maven for building and running java classes. I am looking > > at > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/index.html > > > > Could you please point out how to build & run any specific class like > > OnlineLogisticRegressionTest.java from mahout. > > > > Thanks > > Rajesh > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Mat Kelcey <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Rajesh, Ted has added the test case code already > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1107 > >> > >> On 31 October 2012 05:14, Rajesh Nikam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Ted, > >> > > >> > Please update once JIRA and test case is uploaded. > >> > > >> > Looking forward for your reply. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > Rajesh > >> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Rajesh Nikam <[email protected] > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Ted, > >> > > > >> > > Thanks for reply. I will wait for JIRA and hope to get rid of any > >> > encoding > >> > > issue. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Rajesh > >> > > On Oct 31, 2012 5:24 AM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> OK. I am back up for air. > >> > >> > >> > >> Rajesh, > >> > >> > >> > >> As I am sure you know, most folks here contribute on their own > time. > >> I > >> > >> have been busy with my day job and unable to help with this until > >> just > >> > >> now. > >> > >> > >> > >> I just wrote a test case that looks at the Iris data set. The > >> results > >> > are > >> > >> categorically different from yours. > >> > >> > >> > >> That substantiates my original feeling that your encoding of the > >> data is > >> > >> problematic. I will file a JIRA and attach a test case that you > can > >> > look > >> > >> at. Then we can see what the differences are. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Rajesh Nikam < > [email protected] > >> > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Is there development happening on fixing issue with SGD that > >> generates > >> > >> > models which are as good as random prediction? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I am not sure why such issue is not noticed and raised by others > ? > >> > >> > May be this specific algo is not used in practical applications. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > >> > Rajesh > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ted Dunning < > >> > [email protected] > >> > >> > >wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Rajesh, > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> In the testing that I did, I ran 100, 1000 and 10,000 passes > >> > through > >> > >> > the > >> > >> > >>> data. All produced identical results. Thus it isn't an > issue > >> of > >> > >> SGD > >> > >> > >>> converging. > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> I also did a parameter scan of lambda and saw no effect. > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> I also did the standard thing in R with glm and got the > >> expected > >> > >> > >>> (correct) > >> > >> > >>> results. > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> I haven't looked yet in detail, but I really suspect that the > >> > >> reading > >> > >> > of > >> > >> > >>> the data is horked. This is exactly how that behaves. > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Rajesh Nikam < > >> > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> > >>> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > Hi Ted, > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > I was thinking, this might be due to having only 100 > >> instances > >> > for > >> > >> > >>> > training. > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > So I have created test set with two classes having ~49K > >> > instances, > >> > >> > >>> included > >> > >> > >>> > all features as predictors. > >> > >> > >>> > PFA sgd.grps.zip with test file. > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > mahout trainlogistic --input > >> > >> /usr/local/mahout/trainme/sgd-grps.csv > >> > >> > >>> > --output /usr/local/mahout/trainme/sgd-grps.model --target > >> class > >> > >> > >>> > --categories 2 --features 128 --types n --predictors a1 a2 > >> a3 a4 > >> > >> a5 > >> > >> > a6 > >> > >> > >>> a7 > >> > >> > >>> > a8 a9 a10 a11 a12 a13 a14 a15 a16 a17 a18 a19 a20 a21 a22 > a23 > >> > a24 > >> > >> a25 > >> > >> > >>> a26 > >> > >> > >>> > a27 a28 a29 a30 a31 a32 a33 a34 a35 a36 a37 a38 a39 a40 a41 > >> a42 > >> > >> a43 > >> > >> > >>> a44 a45 > >> > >> > >>> > a46 a47 a48 a49 a50 a51 a52 a53 a54 a55 a56 a57 a58 a59 a60 > >> a61 > >> > >> a62 > >> > >> > >>> a63 a64 > >> > >> > >>> > a65 a66 a67 a68 a69 a70 a71 a72 a73 a74 a75 a76 a77 a78 a79 > >> a80 > >> > >> a81 > >> > >> > >>> a82 a83 > >> > >> > >>> > a84 a85 a86 a87 a88 a89 a90 a91 a92 a93 a94 a95 a96 a97 a98 > >> a99 > >> > >> a100 > >> > >> > >>> a101 > >> > >> > >>> > a102 a103 a104 a105 a106 a107 a108 a109 a110 a111 a112 a113 > >> a114 > >> > >> a115 > >> > >> > >>> a116 > >> > >> > >>> > a117 a118 a119 a120 a121 a122 a123 a124 a125 a126 a127 > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > mahout runlogistic --input > >> > /usr/local/mahout/trainme/sgd-grps.csv > >> > >> > >>> --model > >> > >> > >>> > /usr/local/mahout/trainme/sgd-grps.model --auc --confusion > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > Still the results are similar, it classifies everything as > >> > >> class_1. > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > AUC = 0.50 > >> > >> > >>> > confusion: [[*26563.0, 23006.0*], [0.0, 0.0]] > >> > >> > >>> > entropy: [[-0.0, -0.0], [-46.1, -21.4]] > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > I am not sure why this is failing all the time. > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > Looking forward for your reply. > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > Thanks > >> > >> > >>> > Rajesh > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Ted Dunning < > >> > >> [email protected]> > >> > >> > >>> > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > > I would love to help and will before long. Just can't do > >> it > >> > in > >> > >> the > >> > >> > >>> first > >> > >> > >>> > > part of this week. > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Rajesh Nikam < > >> > >> > [email protected] > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > Hello, > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > I have asked below question on issue with using sgd on > >> > mahout > >> > >> > >>> forum. > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > Similar issue with sgd is reported by > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11221436/using-sgd-classifier-in-mahout > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > Even below link has similar output: > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > AUC = 0.57*confusion: [[27.0, 13.0], [0.0, 0.0]]* > >> > >> > >>> > > > entropy: [[-0.4, -0.3], [-1.2, -0.7]] > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > >> > > http://sujitpal.blogspot.in/2012/09/learning-mahout-classification.html > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > I am still wannder confusion how then this model works > >> and > >> > >> used > >> > >> > by > >> > >> > >>> > many ? > >> > >> > >>> > > > Not able to get any points on how to use SGD that > >> generates > >> > >> > >>> effective > >> > >> > >>> > > > model. > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > Could someone point out what is missing in input file > or > >> > >> provided > >> > >> > >>> > > > parameters. > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > I appreciate your help. > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > Below is description of steps that I followed. > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > PF Attached uses input files for experiment. > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > I am using Iris Plants Database from Michael Marshall. > >> PFA > >> > >> > >>> iris.arff. > >> > >> > >>> > > > Converted this to csv file just by updating header: > >> > >> > >>> iris-3-classes.csv > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > mahout org.apache.mahout.classifier. > >> > >> > >>> > > > sgd.TrainLogistic --input > >> > >> > >>> > > /usr/local/mahout/trunk/*iris-3-classes.csv*--features 4 > >> > >> --output > >> > >> > >>> > > /usr/local/mahout/trunk/ > >> > >> > >>> > > > *iris-3-classes.model* --target class *--categories 3* > >> > >> > --predictors > >> > >> > >>> > > > sepallength sepalwidth petallength petalwidth --types n > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> it gave following error. > >> > >> > >>> > > > Exception in thread "main" > >> > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: > >> > >> > Can > >> > >> > >>> only > >> > >> > >>> > > > call classifyScalar with two categories > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > Now created csv with only 2 classes. PFA > >> iris-2-classes.csv > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> trained iris-2-classes.csv with sgd > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > mahout org.apache.mahout.classifier.sgd.TrainLogistic > >> > --input > >> > >> > >>> > > > /usr/local/mahout/trunk/*iris-2-classes.csv* > --features 4 > >> > >> > --output > >> > >> > >>> > > > /usr/local/mahout/trunk/*iris-2-classes.mode*l --target > >> > class > >> > >> > >>> > > *--categories > >> > >> > >>> > > > 2* --predictors sepallength sepalwidth petallength > >> > petalwidth > >> > >> > >>> --types n > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > mahout runlogistic --input > >> > >> > >>> /usr/local/mahout/trunk/iris-2-classes.csv > >> > >> > >>> > > > --model /usr/local/mahout/trunk/iris-2-classes.model > >> --auc > >> > >> > >>> --confusion > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > AUC = 0.14 > >> > >> > >>> > > > confusion: [[50.0, 50.0], [0.0, 0.0]] > >> > >> > >>> > > > entropy: [[-0.6, -0.3], [-0.8, -0.4]] > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> AUC seems to poor. Now changed --predictors > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > mahout org.apache.mahout.classifier.sgd.TrainLogistic > >> > --input > >> > >> > >>> > > > /usr/local/mahout/trunk/*iris-2-classes.csv* > --features 4 > >> > >> > --output > >> > >> > >>> > > > /usr/local/mahout/trunk/*iris-2-classes.mode*l --target > >> > class > >> > >> > >>> > > *--categories > >> > >> > >>> > > > 2* --predictors sepalwidth petallength --types n > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > mahout runlogistic --input > >> > >> > >>> /usr/local/mahout/trunk/iris-2-classes.csv > >> > >> > >>> > > > --model /usr/local/mahout/trunk/iris-2-classes.model > >> --auc > >> > >> > >>> --confusion > >> > >> > >>> > > > --scores > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > AUC = 0.80 > >> > >> > >>> > > > *confusion: [[50.0, 50.0], [0.0, 0.0]]* > >> > >> > >>> > > > entropy: [[-0.7, -0.3], [-0.7, -0.4]] > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > This model classifies everything as category 1 which of > >> no > >> > >> use. > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > Thanks > >> > >> > >>> > > > Rajesh > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
