On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> As an interesting tree-based alternative, I think that your data is small > enough to use the standard random forest implementation. Random Forest appears to work quite well for my situation. Training is very fast; Prediction is also very fast; Accuracy is quite high - even better than J48 on a bigger test set. Thanks for the pointers, Ted. Cheers, Magesh
