Who is the moderator for our lists?

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]>wrote:

> To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to user-unsubscribe@mahout.**
> apache.org <[email protected]>
>
>
> On 1/10/13 11:14 AM, Walshe, Maurice (RBI-UK) wrote:
>
>> unsubscribe
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: akshay shetye 
>> [mailto:akshay.shetye@gmail.**com<[email protected]>
>> ]
>> Sent: 10 January 2013 14:40
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: machine learning algorithm giving wrong results
>>
>> Thanks for replying.This is not a homework problem ,I just related my
>> real use case to a simple example problem.
>>
>> I did regression and problem i was facing is i get negative predictions
>> of travel time.
>> There are many other features in input feature list , Day of week : (on
>> some days he goes to church /temple on the way) Start time : (there will
>> be more traffice at 8.30 than 7) etc
>>
>> Can u elaborate more and tell about the solution.Am not a expert in
>> machine learning . am new to this.
>>
>> Note :sorry for starting new thread i somehow dont get mails of this
>> user group in this mail Regards, Damodar
>>
>> -- This is a regression problem. The regression algorithm available in
>> Mahout
>>
>> is logistic regression.  You can force it to solve this problem in two
>> ways.  First, you can scale and offset the output by a large enough
>> factor so that the normal 0 to 1 output range is much larger than
>> necessary and the mean is centered at the rough mean of your data.  The
>> only input feature would be wake-up time.
>>
>> Another approach would be to use multinomial output with three outputs.
>>   This is a more natural fit to the Mahout algorithm.
>>
>> Is this a homework problem?
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:16 PM, akshay shetye
>> <[email protected]>**wrote:
>>
>>  I have a machine learning problem which i am illustrating by giving a
>>> simile ,less complex example
>>>
>>> John goes from home to office daily.He takes following time to reach
>>> to office
>>>
>>> Bus -> 3 hours
>>> Cab -> 2 hours
>>> bike -> 1 hours
>>>
>>> Problem:How much time john will take to reach his office from the time
>>> he starts.
>>>
>>> He mostly takes bus and sometimes cab and rarely bike depending on how
>>> much time he has to reach his office
>>>
>>> He must reach at office at 9am.
>>>
>>> Now if he starts at 6 he takes bus
>>>       if he starts at 7 he takes cab
>>>       if he starts at  8 he takes bike.
>>>
>>> Now the model which i build using M5P and libSvm predicts fine when he
>>> starts on or before 8.Now the problem occurs when John leaves his home
>>> after 8 (eg 8.30 or 9 /assume he got up late) . Ideally in this case
>>> he will take around 1 hour as he should take his bike.
>>>
>>> My model is giving me negative predictions and this is what is causing
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Now as john wakes up late very rarely we have very few data points to
>>> train it on such cases.
>>>
>>> My feature list is as follows
>>>
>>> timeLeftForDuty, DAY_OF_WEEK , TRAVEL_TIME
>>>
>>> TRAVEL_TIME is we are trying to predict.
>>>
>>> How can solve this problem?Meaning how can i avoid getting negati
>>> values of travel time?Which algorithm should i use from mahout?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Damodar Shetyo
>>>
>>>
>> Regards,
>> Damodar Shetyo
>>
>> ===================== DISCLAIMER ======================
>> This message is intended only for the use of the person(s)
>> ("Intended Recipient") to whom it is addressed. It may contain
>> information which is privileged and confidential. Accordingly
>> any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this
>> message or any of its content by any person other than the Intended
>> Recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is
>> strictly prohibited. If you are not the Intended Recipient, please
>> contact the sender as soon as possible.
>>
>> Reed Business Information Limited.
>> Registered Office: Quadrant House, The Quadrant, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS,
>> UK.
>> Registered in England under Company No. 151537
>>
>> ==============================**=========================
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to