Ahh... That makes a lot of sense.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Lauren Massa-Lochridge <[email protected]>wrote: > Ted Dunning <ted.dunning <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > > OK. > > > > So the easy answer strikes out. > > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Swami Kevala < > > swami.kevala <at> ishafoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > Ted Dunning <ted.dunning <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > Does your index actually have term vectors? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Swami Kevala < > > > > swami.kevala <at> ishafoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well yes... I used the example data that was supplied with the Solr > 4.3.1 > > > installation. I checked the schema before posting the example docs to > the > > > index, and it already had the option termVectors="true" set for the > > > "includes" > > > field by default > > > > > > > > > > I've had the same error message only once, using a schema I've had in use > over multiple version upgrades. I.e. a schema known to be correctly > configured for term vectors. > I hadn't noticed that only a miniscule count of documents had been indexed. > If I recall correctly, it was well < 100. > > I never use the example data, but I would check to see that its all really > indexed or try a larger data set in case something changed relative to the > example data. > > Lauren Massa-Lochridge > AC7IONABL3 > > > >
