Yes!

But it is very hard to find the time.



On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Andrew Musselman <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd like to see cross-recommendations added too.
>
> But I also want some automation of the steps required to build a simple
> recommender like the solr/mahout example Ted and Ellen have in their
> pamphlet.
>
> Lowering the barrier to entry by providing a sample pipeline would help a
> lot of folks get started and hopefully would keep them interested.  Perhaps
> in examples/bin?
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > There's been work done on the cross-recommender. There is a Mahout-style
> > XRecommenderJob that has two preference models for two actions or
> > preference types. It uses matrix multiply to get a cooccurrence type
> > similarity matrix. If we had a cross-row-similarity-job, it could pretty
> > easily be integrated and I'd volunteer to integrate it. The XRSJ is
> > probably beyond me right now so if we can scare up someone to do that
> we'd
> > be a long way down the road.
> >
> > I'll put a feature request into Jira and take this to the dev list
> >
> > BTW this is already integrated with the solr-recommender.
> >
> > On Feb 8, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I have different opinions about each piece.
> >
> > I think that cross recommendation is as core as RowSimilarityJob and
> should
> > be a parallel implementation or integrated.  Parallel is probably easier.
> > It is even plausible to have a version of RowSimilarityJob that doesn't
> > support all the different distance measures but does support multiple
> cross
> > and direct processing using LLR or related cooccurrence based measures.
>  It
> > would be very cool if a single pass over the data could do many kinds of
> co
> > or cross occurrence operations.
> >
> > For dithering, it really is post processing.  That said, it is also the
> > single largest improvement that anybody typically gets when testing
> > different options so it is a bit goofy to not have good support for some
> > kinds of dithering.
> >
> > For Thompson sampled recommenders, I am not sure where to start hacking
> on
> > our current code.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > That was by no means to criticize effort level, which has been
> impressive
> > > especially during the release.
> > >
> > > It was more a question about the best place to add these things and
> > > whether they are important. Whether people see these things as custom
> > post
> > > processing or core.
> > >
> > > On Feb 8, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > The reason that we aren't adding this like cross-rec and other things
> is
> > > that "we" have full-time jobs, mostly.  Suneel is full-time on Mahout,
> > but
> > > the rest are not.  You seem more active than most.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to