Looks like a bug to me as well; I would have expected something similar to
what you were expecting except maybe something like this which puts the "c"
and "r" values in objects rather than arrays of single-element objects:
{
"cluster":"VL-10515",
"n":5924,
"c":
{
"action":0.023,
"adherence":0.223,
"administration":0.011
},
"r":
{
"action":0.446,
"adherence":1.501,
"administration":0.306
}
}
Could you please file a ticket in Jira describing what you've described
here?
Thanks
Andrew
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Terry Blankers <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, I'm working on some automated analysis of the clusterdump output
> using '-of = JSON'. While digging into the structure of the representation
> of the data I've noticed something that seems a little odd to me.
>
> In order to access the data for a particular cluster, the 'cluster', 'n',
> 'c' & 'r' values are all in one continuous string. For example:
>
> {"cluster":"VL-10515{n=5924 c=[action:0.023, adherence:0.223,
> administration:0.011 r=[action:0.446, adherence:1.501,
> administration:0.306]}"}
>
> This is also the case for the "point":
>
> {"point":"013FFD34580BA31AECE5D75DE65478B3D691D138 = [body:6.904,
> harm:10.101]","vector_name":"013FFD34580BA31AECE5D75DE65478
> B3D691D138","weight":"1.0"}
>
> This leads me to believe that the only way I can get to the individual
> data in these items is by string parsing. For JSON deserialization I would
> have expected to see something along the lines of:
>
> {
> "cluster":"VL-10515",
> "n":5924,
> "c":
> [
> {"action":0.023},
> {"adherence":0.223},
> {"administration":0.011}
> ],
> "r":
> [
> {"action":0.446},
> {"adherence":1.501},
> {"administration":0.306}
> ]
> }
>
> and:
>
> {
> "point": {
> "body": 6.904,
> "harm": 10.101
> },
> "vector_name": "013FFD34580BA31AECE5D75DE65478B3D691D138",
> "weight": 1.0
> }
>
>
> Please forgive the naive question if I'm missing something obvious, but
> can anybody explain the rationale for the current structure of the JSON? Is
> there another efficient way to access the items in question using JSON
> without using custom string parsing logic? Or would it make sense to modify
> the json output from clusterdump?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Terry
>
>
