I have this problem using 0.9 (using the Hortonworks Sandbox v2.1).
I have also tried using the trunk version under windows but that gives me the
following (different) error when using multiple fields (using the same command
format as 0.9):
Unexpected YYYY while processing Job-Specific Options:
The command format that I've used (for both versions) is:
mahout lucene2seq -i /inputdir -o /outputdir -id idfield -f XXXX,YYYY -q
tableName:table1
to reiterate, this command works on version 0.9 using the same data (although
it falls over if YYYY is empty in some documents).
________________________________________
From: Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>
Sent: 30 August 2014 00:05
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: lucene2seq and empty fields
Which Mahout version?
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Tom LAMPERT <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have running into a problem with lucene2seq and I'm wondering whether
> any of you can help me. I have a Solr index in which the documents contain
> several fields and some of these fields are empty in some of the documents.
> The problem that I am encountering is that lucene2seq gives the error:
>
>
> Error: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Field 'XXXXXXX' does not exist
> in the index?
>
>
> when an empty field is encountered. I have verified that the field exists
> by querying the Solr (but as I have said, it is empty). Can anyone help
> with this?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Tom
>
