Thanks Karl, But intentionally I am trying to use LDAP group for authorization. Additionally in the repository connection setting under the Type tab the Authority connection is configurable by keeping the options in a drop-down list. Thus I thought this can be possible.
Regards Anupam On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Anupam, > > Every repository connection has exactly ONE authority associated with it. > Only tokens from that authority will match documents indexed with that > repository connection. > > You are getting a mismatch because you pointed your Documentum repository > connection at the LDAP authority. You need to change it to point to the > Documentum authority, and then reindex. > > Thanks, > Karl > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Anupam Bhattacharya > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I configured a Documentum Repository connection with LDAP Authority >> connection. I see that the documents are now getting indexed with prefix >> similar to the LDAP Authority connection title(XYZ_LDAP). >> >> e.g. literal.allow_token_document >> =XYZ_LDAP:DOCBASE%3Ag_elec_witness.dm_4500271180000532 >> >> But the ManifoldCFSearchComponent never authenticate users to show the >> actual filtered results because the LDAP Authority never returns any token. >> This I confirmed by checking the tokens using the following url >> >> http://localhost:8080/mcf-authority-service/UserACLs?username={username} >> >> Additionally If i configure a Documentum Authority connection also >> configured in MCF then we will get the tokens but the format never match. >> >> e.g. >> XYZ_Documentum:DOCBASE%3Ag_elec_witness.dm_4500271180000532 >> >> Since the documents in SOLR indexes is indexed with prefix XYZ_LDAP & >> Authority service returns tokens with Documentum specific Authority >> connection i.e. XYZ_Documentum. Due to which the match is never made and >> thus the ManifoldCFSearchComponent never work while trying to secure the >> documents in SOLR repository. >> >> It seems to be a bug. Pls. help me for a workaround on this problem. >> >> Regards >> Anupam >> > > -- Thanks & Regards Anupam Bhattacharya
