Thanks Karl,

I have taken 1.5  source from
http://manifoldcf.apache.org/en_US/download.html & not from svn.. I have
also taken code from svn which seems to be of 1.6.

Can you help me to get 1.5 svn link.

Regards.


On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Lalit,
>
> (1) Download the patch
> (2) At the root level of your source tree, do the following:
>
> svn patch CONNECTORS-910.patch
>
> That should do it.
>
> Karl
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:47 PM, lalit jangra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Karl,
>>
>> I would like to apply a patch. Can you help me with instructions?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lalit,
>>>
>>> So let me be sure I understand.
>>>
>>> (1) You see the metadata items listed
>>> (2) The metadata items you want to index are included in that list
>>> (3) You have a metadata rule set up to include those metadata items (or,
>>> ALL metadata items for that part of the hierarchy)
>>> (4) You are still not seeing those metadata items being sent to Solr
>>>
>>> If this is correct, then you *do* need the fix for CONNECTORS-910, which
>>> was released as part of MCF 1.6.  I think you can simply generate a patch
>>> and apply it, rather than upgrading.  Is that something you want to try?
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, lalit jangra <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for wrong screenshots.Actually i can see individual metadata
>>>> items listed in pull down as below. Please guide.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Lalit,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please send me a screen shot from your Metadata tab so that I can see
>>>>> if there's any miscommunication.  You should be able to see individual
>>>>> metadata items listed in a pull down if you drill in sufficiently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, lalit jangra <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Karl,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not able to see any metadata properties as below. So I need to
>>>>>> use 1.6.1 only or is there any alternative?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Lalit,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you go to the Metadata tab for your SharePoint job, and build up
>>>>>>> a path by drilling down into one of the libraries or lists, do you see 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> metadata names you want in the pulldown?  If so, your problem might be
>>>>>>> this, fixed in 1.6:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CONNECTORS-910: SharePoint connector does not fetch metadata values
>>>>>>> for sub-site document libraries.
>>>>>>> (Ahmet Arslan, Karl Wright)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:29 AM, lalit jangra <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am working on Apache MCF 1.5.1 with solr 4.6. I am integrating
>>>>>>>> multiple content sources here one of which is Sharepoint 2010. I want 
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> know how can i get content creator/author from content in Sharepoint 
>>>>>>>> 2010.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For same, i am going thru MCF source code and zeroed in on
>>>>>>>> SharePointRepository.java under
>>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.connectors.sharepoint package. But i 
>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>> see ACLs  getting used here but no mention of content author/creator.  
>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>> can i get content creator here?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Secondly i also want to index these ACLs in solr indexes so that
>>>>>>>> search results can be user specific to maintain content permissions &
>>>>>>>> privileges.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can someone help me in above queries?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Lalit Jangra.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Lalit Jangra.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Lalit Jangra.
>>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Lalit Jangra.

Reply via email to