Hi Karl Yes this matches what we are experiencing.
Cheers, Will On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > The following article is about someone who wants to set exactly the > permission you describe in SharePoint 2007, and is being told that custom > development is needed to do it properly: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7307914/display-document-only-to-user-who-uploaded-it-in-sharepoint > > It looks like you can fake this by controlling the kinds of views people > can create in both SP2007 and SP2010. It's not really changing the > permission of the document, but it is changing whether people can list it. > Does this match what you are seeing? > > Karl > > > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Will, >> >> Heretofore I've never heard of any such thing, in many SharePoint >> installations prior to 2010, and for anyone using SharePoint 2010 as well. >> Obviously if the security is more restrictive than MCF knows about, MCF >> security won't do the right thing either, so it's pretty important to get >> to the bottom of this issue. >> >> I'll do some research and see if there's any information online. >> >> Karl >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Will Parkinson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> We have a Sharepoint connector running in ManifoldCF which has been >>> running pretty well. However we seem to have encountered a strange >>> permissions structure in Sharepoint. >>> >>> It seems for some files (seemingly only file attachments in my case) >>> have a permissions caveat separate from Sharepoint's normal permissions >>> service that indicates if the file or set of files is only viewable by the >>> creator. >>> >>> The files themselves have the same kind of permissions as any other file >>> in Sharepoint, but there looks to be a flag set somewhere that restricts >>> all these documents to the user only and ignores any other permission. >>> >>> Has anybody encountered a similar issue? If so, is there a way around >>> it? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Will >>> >> >> >
