Hi Lalit,

Yes, of course there are lots of improvements in 1.7.  That would be the
whole point.

You don't have to upgrade in production until you are sure it works for
you.  You can build and run a local 1.7 MCF instance (which has its own
Derby database) and just see if you can crawl using the new code.

Karl



On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:33 AM, lalit jangra <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Karl,
>
> Please suggest if using MCF 1.7 can be really worth trying here. I assume
> there wourd be lots of improvements in 1.7 as compared to 1.5.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lalit,
>>
>> You would have to patch the CMIS connector up to the 1.7 level first.
>> I'm not even sure that can easily be done, because of other infrastructure
>> changes between 1.5 and 1.7.  At any rate, if you want to try that, you'll
>> have to do it yourself; I'm very busy this week.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:12 AM, lalit jangra <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Karl,
>>>
>>> Can i get any patch for MCF 1.5.1 or do i need to use 1.7 to fix this
>>> issue?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Lalit,
>>>>
>>>> The CMIS connector in 1.5 had multiple problems, since corrected.  I
>>>> strongly suggest you adopt MCF 1.7 if you want any hope of getting fixes
>>>> for that connector.
>>>>
>>>> Also, in branches/dev_1x there is an updated alfresco connector, which
>>>> may very well work properly against Alfresco 4.2.x.  It might be worth an
>>>> experiment to see if that works for you, instead of the CMIS connector.
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:04 AM, lalit jangra <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Karl,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am connecting to Alfresco version 4.2.2 using cmis connector.
>>>>> Connection works fine as in attached screenshot but job does not run.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Lalit,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CMIS is returning a null document identifier during seeding.  What
>>>>>> repository are you connecting to here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:51 AM, lalit jangra <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am using MCF 1.5.1 and connecting to alfresco 4.2.2 using CMIS
>>>>>>> connector. For alfresco job, i am passing below query as parameter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SELECT cmis:name FROM cmis:document WHERE
>>>>>>> CONTAINS('PATH:/app:company_home/st:sites/cm:am/cm:documentLibrary//*') 
>>>>>>> AND
>>>>>>> cmis:createdBy NOT like '%System%' AND cmis:contentStreamLength > 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But when i am trying to restart this job, i get this error and job
>>>>>>> does not start.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ERROR 2014-09-08 12:24:54,604 (Startup thread) - Exception tossed:
>>>>>>> Couldn't encrypt: null
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.core.interfaces.ManifoldCFException: Couldn't
>>>>>>> encrypt: null
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.core.system.ManifoldCF.addToHash(ManifoldCF.java:592)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.core.system.ManifoldCF.encrypt(ManifoldCF.java:647)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.core.system.ManifoldCF.hash(ManifoldCF.java:562)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.SeedingActivity.addSeedDocument(SeedingActivity.java:101)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.SeedingActivity.addSeedDocument(SeedingActivity.java:126)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.connectors.cmis.CmisRepositoryConnector.addSeedDocuments(CmisRepositoryConnector.java:761)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.StartupThread.run(StartupThread.java:153)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>> org.apache.manifoldcf.core.system.ManifoldCF.addToHash(ManifoldCF.java:587)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         ... 6 more
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please suggest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Lalit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Lalit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Lalit.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Lalit.
>

Reply via email to