I've attached a patch. The ticket was already resolved in the dev_1x branch.
Thanks, Karl On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > You are correct. See CONNECTORS-1107. I will be attaching a patch > shortly. > > Karl > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Michael Wilken <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm running into an issue when trying to migrate a config from one >> Manifoldcf instance to another. The config was exported using: >> >> > executecommand.sh org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.ImportConfiguration >> ~/qa-manifoldcf.conf >> >> >> I copy the export file to another server, and try to import it into a >> different Manifoldcf instance: >> >> > executecommand.sh org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.ImportConfiguration >> ~/qa-manifoldcf.conf >> >> Configuration file successfully read >> org.apache.manifoldcf.core.interfaces.ManifoldCFException: Error reading >> configuration file: Unknown authority configuration version: 3 >> at >> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.ManifoldCF.importConfiguration(ManifoldCF.java:816) >> at >> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.ImportConfiguration.doExecute(ImportConfiguration.java:42) >> at >> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.BaseCrawlerInitializationCommand.execute(BaseCrawlerInitializationCommand.java:37) >> at >> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.ImportConfiguration.main(ImportConfiguration.java:60) >> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unknown authority configuration version: 3 >> at >> org.apache.manifoldcf.authorities.authority.AuthorityConnectionManager.importConfiguration(AuthorityConnectionManager.java:259) >> at >> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.ManifoldCF.importConfiguration(ManifoldCF.java:771) >> ... 3 more >> >> At first, the 2 Manifold's were different versions, the source was 1.6.1, >> and the destination was 1.7.2. To rule out version issues, I installed a >> new 1.6.1 instance, and got the same error. There is a difference in >> databases, the source is using Hypersonic, and the destination is Postgres, >> but after a cursory look at the code, I don't think that should be a >> problem. >> >> Any guidance is greatly appreciated! >> >> -mike >> > >
