All the dependencies you mentioned have already been added in the
options.env.win file in the multiprocess-file-example repository.

On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 17:33, Beelz Ryuzaki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, I added it in the options.env.win file. Should it be the one in the
> multiprocess-zk-example document or multiprocess-file-example ?
>
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 17:30, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It's not related at all to elasticsearch.
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could it be a problem of elasticsearch's version ? I'm actually using
>>> 2.1.0 which is pretty old for this new version of ManifoldCF?
>>>
>>> Othman.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 17:23, Beelz Ryuzaki <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I moved back both the jars you mentioned and a different is showing.
>>>> You will find the stack trace attached.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Othman
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 17:09, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've looked at the dependencies; you should not have moved
>>>>> poi-3.15.jar.  Please move that back, and commons-collections4-4.1.jar 
>>>>> too.
>>>>>
>>>>> You *will* need to move curvesapi-1.04.jar though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you include poi.jar, then all dependencies of poi.jar must also be
>>>>>> included.  This would mean that curvesapi-1.04.jar and
>>>>>> commons-collections4-4.1.jar should also be included.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Karl,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I added the two jars that you have mentioned and another one :
>>>>>>> poi-3.15.jar . Unfortunately, there is another error showing. This 
>>>>>>> time, it
>>>>>>> concerns excel files. You will find attached the stack trace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Othman.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 15:32, Karl Wright <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Othman,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, this shows that the jar we moved calls back into another jar,
>>>>>>>> which will also need to be moved.  *That* jar has yet another 
>>>>>>>> dependency
>>>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The list of jars is thus extended to include:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> poi-ooxml-3.15.jar
>>>>>>>> dom4j-1.6.1.jar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <[email protected]
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You will find attached the stack trace. My apologies for the bad
>>>>>>>>> quality of the image, I'm doing my best to send you the stack trace 
>>>>>>>>> as I
>>>>>>>>> don't have the right to send documents outside the company.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your time,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Othman
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 15:16, Karl Wright <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Once again, I need a stack trace to diagnose what the problem is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, actually it didn't solve the problem. I looked into the log
>>>>>>>>>>> file and saw the following error:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Error tossed : org/apache/poi/POIXMLTypeLoader
>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/poi/POIXMLTypeLoader.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe another jar is missing ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Othman.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 15:01, Beelz Ryuzaki <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have tried what you told me to do, and you expected the
>>>>>>>>>>>> crawling resumed. How about the regular expressions? How can I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> make complex
>>>>>>>>>>>> regular expressions in the job's paths tab ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 14:47, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I will try it right away and let you know if it works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 14:15, Karl Wright <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and you also may need to edit your options.env files to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include them in the classpath for startup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you are amenable, there is another workaround you could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try.  Specifically:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) Shut down all MCF processes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (2) Move the following two files from connector-common-lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to lib:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xmlbeans-2.6.0.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poi-ooxml-schemas-3.15.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (3) Restart everything and see if your crawl resumes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I created a ticket for this: CONNECTORS-1450.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One simple workaround is to use the external Tika server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transformer rather than the embedded Tika Extractor.  I'm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into why the jar is not being found.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I'm actually using the latest binary version, and my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job got stuck on that specific file.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The job status is still Running. You can see it in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached file. For your information, the job started 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yesterday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 13:04, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It looks like a dependency of Apache POI is missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we will need a ticket to address this, if you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed using the binary distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm actually using the binary version. For security
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasons, I can't send any files from my computer. I have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> copied the stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trace and scanned it with my cellphone. I hope it will be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> helpful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, I have read the documentation about how to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restrict the crawling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I don't think the '|' works in the specified. For 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance, I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to restrict the crawling for the documents that counts 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 'sound'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word . I proceed as follows: *(SON)* . the document is with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capital letters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I noticed that it didn't take it into consideration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 at 12:40, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Othman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The way you restrict documents with the windows share
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector is by specifying information on the "Paths" tab 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in jobs that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crawl windows shares.  There is end-user documentation 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both online and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distributed with all binary distributions that describe 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how to do this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you found it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for your response, I will start using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zookeeper and I will let you know if it works. I have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another question to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask. Actually, I need to make some filters while 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crawling. I don't want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crawl some files and some folders. Could you give me an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example of how to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use the regex. Does the regex allow to use /i to ignore 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 19:53, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Beelz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File-based sync is deprecated because people often
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have problems with getting file permissions right, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand how to shut processes down cleanly, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zookeeper is resilient
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against that.  I highly recommend using zookeeper sync.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ManifoldCF is engineered to not put files into memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so you do not need huge amounts of memory.  The default 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values are more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than enough for 35,000 files, which is a pretty small 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job for ManifoldCF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm actually not using zookeeper. i want to know how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is zookeeper different from file based sync? I also 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need a guidance on how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to manage my pc's memory. How many Go should I allocate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the start-agent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of ManifoldCF? Is 4Go enough in order to crawler 35K 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 16:11, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your disk is not writable for some reason, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's interfering with ManifoldCF 2.8 locking.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest two things:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (1) Use Zookeeper for sync instead of file-based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sync.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (2) Have a look if you still get failures after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mr Karl,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Mr Karl for your quick response. I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looked into the ManifoldCF log file and extracted the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following warnings :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Attempt to set file lock
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'D:\xxxx\apache_manifoldcf-2.8\multiprocess-file-example\.\.\synch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area\569\352\lock-_POOLTARGET_OUTPUTCONNECTORPOOL_ES 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Lowercase)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Synapses.lock' failed : Access is denied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Couldn't write to lock file; disk may be full.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shutting down process; locks may be left dangling. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You must cleanup before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restarting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ES (lowercase) synapses being the elasticsearch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output connection. Moreover, the job uses Tika to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extract metadata and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file system as a repository connection. During the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job, I don't extract the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content of the documents. I was wandering if the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue comes from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elasticsearch ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 14:08, Karl Wright <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Othman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ManifoldCF aborts a job if there's an error that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks like it might go away on retry, but does not.  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It can be either on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the repository side or on the output side.  If you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at the Simple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> History in the UI, or at the manifoldcf.log file, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you should be able to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a better sense of what went wrong.  Without further 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information, I can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say any more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Beelz Ryuzaki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm Othman Belhaj, a software engineer from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> société générale in France. I'm actually using your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recent version of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manifoldCF 2.8 . I'm working on an internal search 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engine. For this reason,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using manifoldcf in order to index documents on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> windows shares. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encountered a serious problem while crawling 35K 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents. Most of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, when manifoldcf start crawling a big sized 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents (19Mo for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example), it ends the job with the following error: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated service
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interruptions - failure processing document : 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> software caused connection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> abort: socket write error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give me some tips on how to solve this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem, please ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I use PostgreSQL 9.3.x and elasticsearch 2.1.0 .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking forward for your response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Othman BELHAJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to