That's not what you are supposed to do. It really does sound like there's a misalignment between the Alfresco authority connector and the Alfresco authorization model. Let's see if we can fix this.
Karl On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Phillip Rhodes <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, got it. I went back and re-read the chapter from the MCF in > Action book on all this and poked around in the code for the > AuthorityServlet and finally realized that the list of tokens returned > is the union of the set returned by all the different authorities in > play. And I had seen before that the Null authority returns a token > of the form > > TOKEN:Domain:username > > so I added a Null authority to my MCF setup and now testuser1 sees all > 72 documents, but a fictitious user sees only the 65 that are public. > So in that regard, this is working. > > I'm not sure if this is what you're *supposed* to do or not though. > So if anyone could shed any more light on this, it would be > appreciated. > > > I have another, semi-related question, but I'll post it in another > thread. And probably later, it's bed-time here. :-) > > > Phil >
