Apologies for the lack of documentation, in the default setup, the slave
will schedule the work directories for garbage collection when:

(1) Executors terminate.
(2) The slave recovers and discovers work directories for terminal
executors.

Sounds like the docker integration code you're using has a bug in this
respect, either by not scheduling docker directories for garbage collection
during (1) and/or (2).


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Tom Arnfeld <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't have them to hand now, but I recall it saying something in the
> high 90's and 0ns for the max allowed age. I actually found the root cause
> of the probably, docker related and out of mesos's control... though i'm
> still curious about the expected behaviour of the GC process. It doesn't
> seem to be well documented anywhere.
>
> Tom.
>
>
> On 31 July 2014 23:33, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> What do the slave logs say?
>>
>> E.g.
>>
>> I0731 22:22:17.851347 23525 slave.cpp:2879] Current usage 7.84%. Max
>> allowed age: 5.751197441470081days
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Tom Arnfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure if this is something already supported by mesos, and if so
>>> it'd be great if someone could point me in the right direction.
>>>
>>> Is there a way of asking a slave to garbage collect old executors
>>> manually?
>>>
>>> Maybe i'm misunderstanding things, but as each executor does (insert
>>> knowledge gap) mesos works out how long it is able to keep the sandbox for
>>> and schedules it for garbage collection appropriately, also taking into
>>> account the command line
>>>
>>> The disk on one of my slaves is getting quite full (98%) and i'm curious
>>> how mesos is going to behave in this situation. Should it start clearing
>>> things up, given a task could launch that needs to use an amount of disk
>>> space, but that disk is being eaten up by old executor sandboxes.
>>>
>>> It may be worth noting i'm not specifying --gc_delay on any slave right
>>> now, perhaps I should be?
>>>
>>> Any input would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tom.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to