Great, thanks for the clarification.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:06 PM, mohit soni <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> If slave doesn't directly use task id or executor id, and instead use >> the random UUID for cgroup, then my assumption is that it maintains a >> mapping from this UUID to either task or executor id, internally. > > > that's correct.
