You may very well be right, but I'd like to keep this specific thread focussed on figuring out why the expected/implemented behaviour isn't happening in my case if that's ok.
On 28 April 2015 at 19:26, CCAAT <cc...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > I really hate to be the 'old fashion computer scientist' in this group, > but, I think that the role of and usage of 'cgroups' is going to have to > be expanded greatly as a solution to the dynamic memory management needs of > both the cluster(s) and the frameworks. This problem is not going away and I > see no other serious solution to cgroup use expansion.
