+1 to James DeFelice. I don't feel the name is confuse for any circumstance.
2015-06-04 22:06 GMT+08:00 James DeFelice <[email protected]>: > -1 master/worker > -1 master/agent > -1 leader/follower > > +1 master/slave; no change needed > > There's no technical benefit **at all** to a terminology change at this > point. If people want to change the names in their client presentations > that's fine. Master/slave conveys specific meaning that is lost otherwise. > In this context of this project (and elsewhere in Engineering-related > fields) the terms are technical jargon and have no social implications > within such context. > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Till Toenshoff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1. Mesos Worker [node/host/machine] >> 2. Mesos Worker [process] >> 3. No, master/worker seems to address the issue with less changes. >> 4. Begin using the new name ASAP, add a disambiguation to the docs, and >> change old references over time. Fixing the "official" name, even before >> changes are in place, would be a good first step. >> >> >> +1 >> > > > > -- > James DeFelice > 585.241.9488 (voice) > 650.649.6071 (fax) > -- Deshi Xiao Twitter: xds2000 E-mail: xiaods(AT)gmail.com
