Hi David,

We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show the 
current votes during the ranking?

Thanks,
Darren




Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jay,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the topics 
> is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative 
> preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the 
> schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We 
> hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>  
>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this 
>> MesosCon.
>>  
>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a bit 
>> intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic: will 
>> go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a scale of 
>> 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the form in the 
>> future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an example.
>>  
>> Cheers,
>> /J
>> ----- Original message -----
>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected], [email protected]
>> Cc: David Greenberg <[email protected]>, Dave Lester 
>> <[email protected]>, Kiersten Gaffney <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>>  
>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the
>> community have submitted!
>> 
>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>> 
>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to last
>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should
>> be included in the program.
>> 
>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>> 
>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>> 
>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>> 
>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>> 
>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>> 
>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you
>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>> 
>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)

Reply via email to